Not intervening in the political affairs in Baha’ism from claim to reality

Bahaismiran:

18^th of Shahrivar 1393, The Baha’i faith Network investigated the relationship between religion and government in “Baztab” program with one of so-called experts called Farah Doustdar.

In this program Doustdar emphasized that religion isn’t allowed to intervene in policy and government and also government isn’t allowed to intervene in the religious affairs and problems.

Doustdar said a contradictory statement: “Religion isn’t an agent; but it is a collection of teachings. Human beings give it entity.

Speaking about Baha’i teachings, she said several minutes later: “Religion is a directing light which should be exploited in all affairs even in government and economy.”

1. Isn’t the plan for assassinating king Naseruddin and trying for this elimination by the made prophet of the deviant cult of Baha’ism a political one?

2. Isn’t seeking asylum to the Russian embassy by Hussein Ali Nouri in Zagandeh Tehran assumed as a political movement?

3. How can you justify the assassination group set up by Hussein Ali Nouri in Baqdad for eliminating his rivals?

4. Isn’t it a political measure when Abdul Baha, the second LEADER OF Baha’ism received the title sir by the Colonial government of Britain during the war between the UK power and the Palastinian inhabitants.

5. How can the network experts explain the following realities:

a) Shoqi Effendi’s relations with America and the Zionist regime’s heads,

b) The spying nature and action of the universal house of justice in the world

c) The anti-revolutionary presence of Baha’is in post revolution activities especially their active presence in the riots in 1388.

6. Isn’t forming a Baha’i global government assumed as a clear contradiction in Baha’ism while It is thinking of establishing a Baha’i worldwide government.

The Excellency Doustdar, refer and read the history carefully before expressing your ideas.